9:00 - 5:00
Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.
Call Us For Free Consultation
Menu
When a business loan goes into default, the borrower may not be the only party responsible for the outstanding debt. Many commercial loans include a personal guaranty signed by an owner, principal, or another individual who agrees to answer for the borrower's obligations.
For a Colorado bank, that guaranty can provide an additional path toward recovery. However, enforcement depends on the language of the loan documents, the nature of the default, available defenses, and the circumstances surrounding the transaction.
Banks should review the guaranty and related loan documents carefully before deciding how to proceed.
A personal guaranty is an agreement under which a guarantor accepts responsibility for another party's debt according to the terms of the guaranty.
This commonly arises in Colorado commercial lending.
A bank may lend money to a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other business entity. Because the borrower is legally separate from its owners, the bank may require one or more principals to personally guarantee the debt.
If the business defaults, the guaranty may allow the Colorado bank to seek recovery from the guarantor in addition to pursuing remedies against the borrower or collateral.
Our Denver banking and finance attorney represents banks and financial institutions in loan workouts, collections, commercial litigation, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and other creditor matters.
The starting point is the guaranty itself.
A Colorado bank should determine what event triggers the guarantor's obligation and whether that event has occurred. In many transactions, default by the primary borrower triggers rights under the guaranty.
Default can involve more than missed monthly payments. Depending on the loan agreement, it may include:
The bank must compare what happened with the actual default provisions in the loan documents.
Not necessarily.
Whether a lender must pursue the borrower or collateral before seeking payment from a guarantor depends heavily on the language of the guaranty and related agreements.
A properly drafted guaranty may provide the bank with significant flexibility concerning its remedies. Some guaranties contain waivers affecting what the lender must do before pursuing the guarantor.
This makes document review essential.
A Colorado bank should not assume that it must exhaust every remedy against the borrower before considering a guaranty claim. At the same time, it should not assume that every guaranty permits immediate action without reviewing its terms.
A secured commercial loan may involve both collateral and a personal guaranty.
For example, a Colorado business loan could be secured by equipment, inventory, accounts, real estate, or other assets while also being personally guaranteed by the company's owner.
These remedies may interact, but the existence of collateral does not necessarily eliminate the importance of the guaranty.
The bank may need to evaluate:
This analysis can help a Colorado financial institution determine which recovery strategy makes economic sense.
Not every personal guaranty is identical.
Some guaranties cover all obligations owed by the borrower. Others are limited to a specific loan, a maximum dollar amount, or particular obligations.
The agreement may also contain provisions concerning notices, waivers, amendments, extensions, renewals, collateral, and other matters.
Before pursuing a guarantor, a Colorado bank should identify exactly what the guarantor agreed to pay.
Loan modifications deserve particular attention.
If a troubled loan has been renewed, extended, modified, or restructured, counsel should review how those changes affect the guaranty and whether the documents address future modifications.
Small differences in contract language can become significant once litigation begins.
A demand for payment may resolve some defaults without litigation.
When it does not, a Colorado bank may consider filing a lawsuit to enforce the applicable loan and guaranty obligations.
A guaranty action is fundamentally a contract enforcement matter. The lender generally needs to establish the applicable agreement, the obligation, the default, and the amount due while addressing any defenses raised by the guarantor.
Records become especially important at this stage.
The bank should preserve documents such as:
Organized documentation can make enforcement substantially more efficient.
A guarantor facing collection may challenge liability.
The available defenses depend on the facts and documents, but disputes may involve the enforceability or scope of the guaranty, alleged modifications to the underlying obligation, compliance with contractual requirements, calculation of the amount due, or other contract issues.
A guarantor may also dispute whether a particular debt falls within the guaranty's scope.
For a Colorado bank, anticipating these arguments before litigation can help identify weaknesses in the file and determine what evidence should be assembled.
This is another reason banks benefit from legal review before taking aggressive collection action.
Bankruptcy can significantly change the collection process.
When an individual guarantor files bankruptcy, the automatic stay generally prevents creditors from continuing covered collection actions against that debtor without bankruptcy-court authorization.
A Colorado bank may then need to protect its rights through the bankruptcy proceeding.
Depending on the circumstances, that can involve filing a proof of claim, evaluating collateral, monitoring proposed plans, addressing priority disputes, or seeking relief from the automatic stay.
The borrower's bankruptcy and the guarantor's bankruptcy also need to be analyzed separately. A bankruptcy involving one obligated party does not necessarily produce identical consequences for every other person or entity liable on the loan.
Colorado banks should involve creditor counsel promptly when bankruptcy enters the picture.
Litigation is not always the most efficient first response to a default.
A guarantor may have the ability and incentive to resolve the obligation through a negotiated workout. In other cases, delay can increase the bank's risk.
A Colorado lender might consider a negotiated solution when it offers a realistic opportunity to improve recovery while controlling legal expenses.
Possible approaches can include payment arrangements, restructuring, additional collateral, negotiated settlements, or other workout terms appropriate to the transaction.
Any workout should be documented carefully.
The bank should also consider whether delay could affect collateral, other creditors, the guarantor's financial position, or the practical ability to collect later.
The best time to discover a problem in a guaranty is before the loan is funded, not after default.
Colorado banks can reduce future enforcement problems by reviewing loan documentation as part of sound lending procedures.
Pre-default review may identify issues involving:
Douglas D. Koktavy represents financial institutions throughout the lending process, including loan review, workouts, collection litigation, foreclosure, collateral recovery, and bankruptcy matters.
For Denver banks and other Colorado financial institutions, careful documentation at origination can make enforcement significantly more predictable if a borrower later defaults.
A personal guaranty can provide an important additional source of recovery when a Colorado borrower defaults, but enforcement should begin with a careful review of the guaranty, loan documents, collateral position, payment history, and potential defenses.
If your bank is dealing with a defaulted loan or needs to enforce a personal guaranty in Colorado, our attorneys are here to help. Call us today or connect with us online to schedule a consultation.
